<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:28:42 GMT--><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:rss="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"><rss:channel rdf:about="http://www.mbnlaw.com/our-thoughts/"><rss:title>Our Thoughts</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.mbnlaw.com/our-thoughts/</rss:link><rss:description></rss:description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><dc:date>2012-02-06T14:28:42Z</dc:date><admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.squarespace.com/">Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</admin:generatorAgent><rss:items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mbnlaw.com/our-thoughts/2012/1/16/new-draft-of-settlement-statement.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mbnlaw.com/our-thoughts/2011/10/20/new-til-and-gfe-form.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mbnlaw.com/our-thoughts/2011/9/20/companies-now-required-to-use-attorney-when-answering-garnis.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mbnlaw.com/our-thoughts/2011/9/20/most-employers-are-required-to-display-new-nlrb-poster.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mbnlaw.com/our-thoughts/2011/9/13/ajc-reports-foreclosure-plummet.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mbnlaw.com/our-thoughts/2011/8/25/cost-of-secondary-loan-bailouts-to-exceed-fifty-billion.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mbnlaw.com/our-thoughts/2011/8/23/employers-tips-for-avoiding-common-mistakes-in-unemployment.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mbnlaw.com/our-thoughts/2011/6/2/yet-another-form-change-for-residential-closings.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mbnlaw.com/our-thoughts/2011/6/2/irs-scrutinizes-gifts-of-real-estate.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mbnlaw.com/our-thoughts/2011/4/21/standards-proposed-under-dodd-frank.html"/></rdf:Seq></rss:items></rss:channel><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.mbnlaw.com/our-thoughts/2012/1/16/new-draft-of-settlement-statement.html"><rss:title>New Draft of Settlement Statement</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.mbnlaw.com/our-thoughts/2012/1/16/new-draft-of-settlement-statement.html</rss:link><dc:creator>J. Tom Minor, IV</dc:creator><dc:date>2012-01-16T21:12:48Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Good Faith Estimate HUD-1 Real Estate Truth in Lending</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="color: black;">&nbsp;</span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: black;">The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau released its second round of alternative prototypes of a settlement disclosure form to be used during closing to replace the current HUD-1 and Truth in Lending disclosure.<span class="apple">&nbsp;<br /></span><br /></span><span style="color: #4c4945;">Right now, anyone who applies for a mortgage gets two disclosures that contain basic information about the mortgage: the<span class="apple">&nbsp;</span></span><a href="http://www.consumerfinance.gov/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/TILcleanfinal.jpg"><span style="color: #3e8a17;">Truth in Lending form</span></a><span class="apple"><span style="color: #4c4945;">&nbsp;</span></span><span style="color: #4c4945;">and the<span class="apple">&nbsp;</span></span><a href="http://www.consumerfinance.gov/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/GFE.pdf"><span style="color: #3e8a17;">Good Faith Estimate</span></a><span style="color: #4c4945;">.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: black;">Last month, the CFPB tested two prototypes for a disclosure of final loan terms and closing costs. They were both similar. This time around, the CFPB created a different format for this information which are much longer. The current disclosures can be viewed online and are two different formats in five page drafts called Mimosa and Sassafras are available on the </span><a href="http://www.consumerfinance.gov/knowbeforeyouowe/">CFPB website</a><span style="color: black;">.</span></p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.mbnlaw.com/our-thoughts/2011/10/20/new-til-and-gfe-form.html"><rss:title>New TIL and GFE Form</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.mbnlaw.com/our-thoughts/2011/10/20/new-til-and-gfe-form.html</rss:link><dc:creator>J. Tom Minor, IV</dc:creator><dc:date>2011-10-20T13:28:53Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Mortgage Real Estate TIL Truth in Lending</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: black;">The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) recently released its fifth version of the draft mortgage disclosure form comparing a&nbsp;</span><a href="http://www.consumerfinance.gov/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/PINYON_5.pdf"><span style="color: #990000;">fixed-rate</span></a><span style="color: black;">&nbsp;loan and an&nbsp;</span><a href="http://www.consumerfinance.gov/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/YUCCA_5.pdf"><span style="color: #990000;">adjustable-rate</span></a><span style="color: black;">&nbsp; loan.&nbsp; The CFPB said it will test this version of the disclosure with consumers, and consumers are invited to &nbsp;go to this page to enter comments on the proposed form:&nbsp; </span><a href="http://www.consumerfinance.gov/know-before-you-owe-whats-next/"><span style="color: #990000;">&rdquo;Know Before You Owe"</span></a><span style="color: black;">.&nbsp; It appears that&nbsp; the Bureau will finalize this form which combines the Truth in Lending form and Good Faith Estimate form in the very near future.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: black;">The CFPB has indicated it will release the first draft of a revised HUD-1 before Thanksgiving. &nbsp;&nbsp;The last revision to the HUD form, which was effective on January 1, 2010, completely changed the form from a 2 page form to a 3 page form and &nbsp;is very unpopular in the industry.</span></p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.mbnlaw.com/our-thoughts/2011/9/20/companies-now-required-to-use-attorney-when-answering-garnis.html"><rss:title>Companies Now Required to Use Attorney When Answering Garnishments</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.mbnlaw.com/our-thoughts/2011/9/20/companies-now-required-to-use-attorney-when-answering-garnis.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Judy L. Poag</dc:creator><dc:date>2011-09-20T18:27:20Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Business Law Garnishment</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On September 12, 2011, the Georgia Supreme Court adopted an informal State Bar of Georgia opinion stating that any non-lawyer who answers a garnishment in Georgia is engaging in the unauthorized practice of law.&nbsp; This decision means that all companies must now use an attorney licensed in Georgia when answering a summons of garnishment.&nbsp; If a company does not have in-house counsel, then it must engage outside counsel to review and prepare the answers to a summons of garnishment.&nbsp; Any non-lawyer employee who answers on behalf of a company will effectively be engaging in the unauthorized practice of law, and the court may issue a default judgment against the company because the answer was not filed by a licensed attorney.&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.mbnlaw.com/our-thoughts/2011/9/20/most-employers-are-required-to-display-new-nlrb-poster.html"><rss:title>Most Employers are Required to Display New NLRB Poster</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.mbnlaw.com/our-thoughts/2011/9/20/most-employers-are-required-to-display-new-nlrb-poster.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Judy L. Poag</dc:creator><dc:date>2011-09-20T18:02:35Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Employment Law NLRB National Labor Relations Board</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">The National Labor Relations Board (&ldquo;NLRB&rdquo;) recently issued a new rule requiring most private sector employees to post a notice (&ldquo;Notice&rdquo;) &nbsp;informing employees of their rights under the National Labor Relations Act (&ldquo;NLRA&rdquo;).&nbsp; Pursuant to the rule, which becomes effective on November 14, 2011, the Notice must contain specific language informing employees of their right to form, join, or assist a union; to bargain collectively; to join in other concerted activities; and to refrain from such activities.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The rule states that the Notice must be 11-by-17 inches in size, and it must be posted in all places where other employment-related notices are posted.&nbsp; The Notice must be posted in English as well as a foreign language if the foreign language is spoken by 20% or more of the employer&rsquo;s workforce (the NLRB will provide translations of the Notice in other languages).&nbsp; Employers that typically post personnel rules and policies on an internet or intranet site should also post the Notice there, in addition to a physical posting. Employers are not required to distribute the posting by email, Twitter or other electronic means.&nbsp; A copy of the Notice is available for download on the NLRB website at <a href="http://www.nlrb.gov/">www.nlrb.gov</a>.&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">There is a chance that the rule will not go into effect on November 14, 2011 due to an increasing backlash against it.&nbsp; Representative Scott DesJarlais of Tennessee recently introduced House Bill 2854 seeking to repeal the rule.&nbsp; Additionally, the National Association of Manufacturers has filed a lawsuit against the NLRB in the federal district court in Washington, DC in an attempt to block the rule. &nbsp;&nbsp;Due to these recent developments, we recommend that employers be prepared to post the Notice but refrain from posting it until the November 14, 2011 deadline in the event that the rule is successfully challenged.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.mbnlaw.com/our-thoughts/2011/9/13/ajc-reports-foreclosure-plummet.html"><rss:title>AJC Reports Foreclosure Plummet</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.mbnlaw.com/our-thoughts/2011/9/13/ajc-reports-foreclosure-plummet.html</rss:link><dc:creator>J. Tom Minor, IV</dc:creator><dc:date>2011-09-13T13:37:17Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Real Estate foreclosure</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Foreclosures in Atlanta fell to their lowest point in more than two and a half years in September, the latest low point in a trend that has seen figures yo-yo 25 percent or more from month to month.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The Atlanta Journal Constitution reports that loan servicers have slowed foreclosures because home prices are weak and inventory is high and because servicers are working harder with borrowers to keep people out of foreclosure by restructuring loans.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">But has the market bottomed out or is this just additional volatility in a difficult time?</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The truth is no one knows but we can only hope that this is the beginning of a trend.</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.mbnlaw.com/our-thoughts/2011/8/25/cost-of-secondary-loan-bailouts-to-exceed-fifty-billion.html"><rss:title>Cost of Secondary Loan Bailouts to Exceed Fifty Billion</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.mbnlaw.com/our-thoughts/2011/8/25/cost-of-secondary-loan-bailouts-to-exceed-fifty-billion.html</rss:link><dc:creator>J. Tom Minor, IV</dc:creator><dc:date>2011-08-25T14:53:14Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Fannie Mae Freddie Mac Mortgage Real Estate</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will cost taxpayers $51 billion between 2012 and 2021, according to a new estimate released by the Congressional Budget Office.&nbsp; Since placing the government-sponsored enterprises in conservatorship in 2008, the Treasury Department sent $170 billion in subsidies through the second quarter, of which $27.9 billion has been paid back.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the yearly payments to Fannie and Freddie should go down, and the current estimate is that $5 billion will be sent to both mortgage giants by the end of 2011..</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The outlook for the long-term mortgage market remains tentative. Fannie, Freddie and the Federal Housing Administration guaranteed or financed 95% of new mortgages in 2011.</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.mbnlaw.com/our-thoughts/2011/8/23/employers-tips-for-avoiding-common-mistakes-in-unemployment.html"><rss:title>Employers: Tips for Avoiding Common Mistakes in Unemployment Hearings</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.mbnlaw.com/our-thoughts/2011/8/23/employers-tips-for-avoiding-common-mistakes-in-unemployment.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Judy L. Poag</dc:creator><dc:date>2011-08-23T13:42:30Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Employment Law Unemployment Hearing</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://www.mbnlaw.com/judy-poag/">Judy Poag</a>, head of Minor, Bell &amp; Neal's Employment Law Section, will present a <strong>free seminar</strong> to discuss tips for successfully managing your company's unemployment claims.&nbsp; The seminar is scheduled for Thursday, September 1 at 12:00 noon.&nbsp; <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Reservations are required and space is limited</span></strong>.&nbsp; Please RSVP to Rhonda Long at 706.259.2586 or by email at <a href="mailto:rlong@mbnlaw.com">rlong@mbnlaw.com</a>.&nbsp; Lunch will be provided.&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.mbnlaw.com/our-thoughts/2011/6/2/yet-another-form-change-for-residential-closings.html"><rss:title>Yet Another Form Change for Residential Closings</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.mbnlaw.com/our-thoughts/2011/6/2/yet-another-form-change-for-residential-closings.html</rss:link><dc:creator>J. Tom Minor, IV</dc:creator><dc:date>2011-06-02T21:32:04Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Mortgage Real Estate Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau recently revealed two prototypes of mortgage disclosure forms.&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The two prototypes combine the federal Truth in Lending Act mortgage disclosure form with the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act to remove redundant information and hopefully allow consumers to make decisions based on clear and concise language. It would seem that the <a href="http://www.consumerfinance.gov/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/disclosure1.pdf">Ficus Bank</a> is a bit simpler and easier to read but a second form call the <a href="http://www.consumerfinance.gov/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/disclosure2.pdf">Pecan Bank</a> form is also available for review.<br /><br />Of course there was just a major change in RESPA 18 months ago when the RESPA settlement statement form was substantially revised.&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.mbnlaw.com/our-thoughts/2011/6/2/irs-scrutinizes-gifts-of-real-estate.html"><rss:title>IRS Scrutinizes Gifts of Real Estate</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.mbnlaw.com/our-thoughts/2011/6/2/irs-scrutinizes-gifts-of-real-estate.html</rss:link><dc:creator>J. Tom Minor, IV</dc:creator><dc:date>2011-06-02T18:02:59Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Estate Gifts Gift Tax Real Estate Tax</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">The Internal Revenue Service has a low-profile but sweeping effort under way to use state deed records for evidence of omissions in reporting gifts of real estate to family members.&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">New tax rules have made big gifts to family members popular this year, as Congress raised the limit on how much a person can give in a lifetime to $5 million without having to pay gift tax. Still, any time a gift to one person exceeds $13,000, the giver is supposed to let the agency know in a filing.&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The IRS is apparently underway with a coordinated effort to find people who haven't filed Form 709 to report U.S. gift and generation-skipping transfer taxes to the IRS.&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">So far the following states that have handed over information on gift-like transactions: &nbsp;Connecticut, Florida, Hawaii, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Washington and Wisconsin.&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Please be aware that there is no special exception to the rules when making a transfer to a family member and if you are making a gift of property valued at more than $13,000, a gift-tax return must be filed.</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.mbnlaw.com/our-thoughts/2011/4/21/standards-proposed-under-dodd-frank.html"><rss:title>Standards Proposed Under Dodd-Frank</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.mbnlaw.com/our-thoughts/2011/4/21/standards-proposed-under-dodd-frank.html</rss:link><dc:creator>J. Tom Minor, IV</dc:creator><dc:date>2011-04-21T18:37:08Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Dodd-Frank Mortgage Real Estate</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">As we all now know lenders operated pretty willy nilly during the housing boom.&nbsp; Borrowers were encouraged to take out loans that had no realistic ability to be paid back.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The Dodd-Frank financial overhaul passed last year aims to prevent these practices from coming back, mandating that lenders ensure that all borrowers have the ability to pay back their home loans.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The Federal Reserve on Tuesday proposed a set of minimum standards for home lending, creating an &ldquo;ability-to-repay&rdquo; requirement for most home loans, as part of an effort to make sure that U.S. lenders don&rsquo;t return to the shady practices of the housing market boom. Click on the <a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/bcreg/bcreg20110419a1.pdf">highlights</a> for more information.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Under the Dodd-Frank Act Lenders would be able to meet the standard by verifying the consumer&rsquo;s income or assets <em><span style="text-decoration: underline;">or</span></em> making a &ldquo;qualified mortgage&rdquo; that requires the lender to calculate the maximum interest payment in the first five years.&nbsp; Loans that meet that standard would have protections against lawsuits and would have restrictions on fees and would not allow the principal balance to grow.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The Fed is seeking comments on the <a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/bcreg/bcreg20110419b1.pdf">proposal</a> by July 22<sup>nd</sup>.</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item></rdf:RDF>
